Canvas Is Canon, Not Content

Support the author – Nich Davies – by subscribing to the release guru newsletter.

The lede

Social media can be art — but art is not social media.

Spotify’s Canvas lives at the moment of playback, synced to the recording and replacing the cover in Now Playing. That makes it part of the record’s identity: a canonical visual, closer to an official visualizer or mini-music video, not a fleeting post that changes whenever a campaign pivots.

Right now, Canvas sits under User Content terms. Legally, that frames it like a feed clip: broad, sub-licensable, modifiable, derivative-friendly. Culturally, fans experience it as the face of the track. The mismatch erodes artistic integrity, muddies copyright expectations, and turns catalogs into timelines.

It’s time to fix it.

The problem we created by calling artwork “content”

Ephemerality over authorship.

When playback artwork is treated like a social slot, iteration becomes the norm and continuity becomes optional. Great for growth experiments, terrible for artistic identity.

Derivative latitude vs. finished work.

A social-style license that allows modification and derivative use clashes with the idea of a completed work tied to a specific master.

Catalog decay.

When the “face of the record” keeps changing, provenance frays. Provenance is the backbone journalists, historians, and cultures rely on.

What Canvas actually is